Comments on: Oral sex article ignores bigger picture http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/10/oral-sex-article-ignores-bigger-picture/ Breaking CSUN news and information. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:52:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: francheezy http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/10/oral-sex-article-ignores-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-19533 francheezy Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:58:04 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=15656#comment-19533 OH SNAP!!!!!!!!11! OH SNAP!!!!!!!!11!

]]> By: Allen http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/10/oral-sex-article-ignores-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-18990 Allen Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:52:32 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=15656#comment-18990 I agree with the first comment, how did this slip by the editor and get published in the sundial? I agree with the first comment, how did this slip by the editor and get published in the sundial?

]]> By: billimarie http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/10/oral-sex-article-ignores-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-16321 billimarie Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:15:14 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=15656#comment-16321 Hi Bridget, Thanks for writing this article. I agree with the first comment and I think you did a great job at rectifying a serious wrong (the OG oral sex article). It's quite disturbing that an article like that would be published in a sex column, due to it's extreme immaturity (for lack of a better word). Doesn't reflect well on the Sundial as a whole. -b Hi Bridget,

Thanks for writing this article. I agree with the first comment and I think you did a great job at rectifying a serious wrong (the OG oral sex article). It’s quite disturbing that an article like that would be published in a sex column, due to it’s extreme immaturity (for lack of a better word). Doesn’t reflect well on the Sundial as a whole.

-b

]]> By: Quint Flint http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/10/oral-sex-article-ignores-bigger-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-15037 Quint Flint Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:28:41 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=15656#comment-15037 The problem many had with the article in general was it's lack of professionalism. It was practically a diary entry that was mostly about her. Your article touches on how stats and sources could have been used in it. I'm surprised the editor did not step in before it was published. The problem many had with the article in general was it’s lack of professionalism. It was practically a diary entry that was mostly about her. Your article touches on how stats and sources could have been used in it. I’m surprised the editor did not step in before it was published.

]]>