Comments on: No chance for Chanticleers http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/11/no-chance-for-chanticleers/ Breaking CSUN news and information. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: kevin http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/11/no-chance-for-chanticleers/comment-page-1/#comment-17921 kevin Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:24:50 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=17916#comment-17921 sorry for duplicate posts...when i hit "enter" the page froze on my laptop. when i refreshed the thing was posted twice. ADMIN: feel free to delete the duplicate :-) sorry for duplicate posts…when i hit “enter” the page froze on my laptop. when i refreshed the thing was posted twice.

ADMIN: feel free to delete the duplicate

:-)

]]> By: kevin http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/11/no-chance-for-chanticleers/comment-page-1/#comment-17920 kevin Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:20:28 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=17916#comment-17920 you can throw baseless insults at me all you want, but i think you or anyone else will find it hard to argue that it is ridiculous to have to read factual errors and careless spelling and grammar errors in the school paper on a daily basis. i know that it is embarrassing to put my name on something that comes back with tons of "red pen" on it, and my works are not distributed to a potential audience of 35,000+ students (except for that one submission last semester - "The Mainstreaming of Love") every time i write. i am only upset and embarrassed as a student to have to read time and time again the errors that appear in the Sundial every issue, especially when the errors are so easy to spot that they could be cleaned up with ONE edit. you can throw baseless insults at me all you want, but i think you or anyone else will find it hard to argue that it is ridiculous to have to read factual errors and careless spelling and grammar errors in the school paper on a daily basis. i know that it is embarrassing to put my name on something that comes back with tons of “red pen” on it, and my works are not distributed to a potential audience of 35,000+ students (except for that one submission last semester – “The Mainstreaming of Love”) every time i write.

i am only upset and embarrassed as a student to have to read time and time again the errors that appear in the Sundial every issue, especially when the errors are so easy to spot that they could be cleaned up with ONE edit.

]]> By: kevin http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/11/no-chance-for-chanticleers/comment-page-1/#comment-17916 kevin Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:14:32 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=17916#comment-17916 you can throw out baseless insults all you choose to, but i'm sure anyone will find it hard to argue that it is very embarrassing to put your name on ANYTHING that is factually false or has simple spelling errors in it. i am just upset and embarrassed (as a CSUN student) that i continue to find errors over and over and over again in the Sundial that I feel could be easily cleaned up with just ONE edit. you can throw out baseless insults all you choose to, but i’m sure anyone will find it hard to argue that it is very embarrassing to put your name on ANYTHING that is factually false or has simple spelling errors in it.

i am just upset and embarrassed (as a CSUN student) that i continue to find errors over and over and over again in the Sundial that I feel could be easily cleaned up with just ONE edit.

]]> By: kevin http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/11/no-chance-for-chanticleers/comment-page-1/#comment-17912 kevin Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:09:51 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=17916#comment-17912 thanks for catching that. it's about time SOMEBODY paid attention to what is written in this world. now if we can only get someone to read the basketball stories before they are printed... kobe sucks...i thank you again for catching my errors (i did not have my "stylebook" on me as you obviously did). all that says about you is that you are familiar with what the stylebook is and how it is to be used, but i have a hard time saying that for the Sundial staff. I mean, the content of the stories is good and all, but with careless mistakes made time and time again, it is hard to read anything all the way through without having to stop to understand what word is missing or how the facts have been jumbled... thanks for catching that. it’s about time SOMEBODY paid attention to what is written in this world. now if we can only get someone to read the basketball stories before they are printed…

kobe sucks…i thank you again for catching my errors (i did not have my “stylebook” on me as you obviously did). all that says about you is that you are familiar with what the stylebook is and how it is to be used, but i have a hard time saying that for the Sundial staff.

I mean, the content of the stories is good and all, but with careless mistakes made time and time again, it is hard to read anything all the way through without having to stop to understand what word is missing or how the facts have been jumbled…

]]> By: Kobe sucks http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/11/no-chance-for-chanticleers/comment-page-1/#comment-17746 Kobe sucks Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:16:57 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=17916#comment-17746 It's "Stylebook," not "style book," you intelligent human being. I guess you're not perfect either. Actually I take that back, you might be the most perfect do*che there is. It’s “Stylebook,” not “style book,” you intelligent human being. I guess you’re not perfect either. Actually I take that back, you might be the most perfect do*che there is.

]]> By: Kobe sucks http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/11/no-chance-for-chanticleers/comment-page-1/#comment-17745 Kobe sucks Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:12:52 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=17916#comment-17745 It's a "Stylebook," not a "style book" you intelligent human being. I guess you're not perfect either. I take that back, you might actually be the most perfect douche there is. It’s a “Stylebook,” not a “style book” you intelligent human being. I guess you’re not perfect either. I take that back, you might actually be the most perfect douche there is.

]]> By: Kevin http://sundial.csun.edu/2009/11/no-chance-for-chanticleers/comment-page-1/#comment-17633 Kevin Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:04:05 +0000 http://sundial.csun.edu/?p=17916#comment-17633 Does anybody read these sports articles before they get published? Yesterday's was filled with typos and today's has a few factual errors. Namely, CCU was up 38-28 before a 6-0 CSUN run to end the half. That made it 38-34, not 38-32. Also, can someone crack open an AP style book? Does anybody read these sports articles before they get published? Yesterday’s was filled with typos and today’s has a few factual errors. Namely, CCU was up 38-28 before a 6-0 CSUN run to end the half. That made it 38-34, not 38-32. Also, can someone crack open an AP style book?

]]>