California Teachers Association supports Gov. Brown’s tax initiative

 By
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

Courtesy of MCT California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the state budget Thursday, June 30, 2011 at the state Capitol in Sacramento. Voters will decide on a tax plan in November, determining the future of higher education. Courtesy of MCT


The future of publicly funded schools in California will be decided through budget proposals this November by three different groups, including one endorsed by Gov. Jerry Brown.

Late last month, the California Teachers Association, one of the largest education unions in California, officially announced its backing of Brown’s plan. The Service Employees International Union, another sizable education union, hasn’t formally chosen a side on this topic, but is expected to support Brown’s plan.

“No position, we’re withholding judgment at this time,” said Terry Brown, senior government relations advocate for the SEIU. “I think we are likely to support it.”

Terry Brown explained that cuts are necessary to balance the state budget, as education takes up roughly half of the expenses. He said that they have cut $20 billion over the last six years to education. Under Gov. Brown’s new tax plan there will be cuts either way, more so if his plan doesn’t pass.

“You tell me how to fund education without it? We can’t. You want to tax the wealthy, or raise tuition on students as we have been?” said Terry Brown. “If the revenues don’t pass, it’s going to be very gloomy — if you’re a student and don’t vote for this, your screwing yourself.”

In his proposal of the state budget Jan. 10, 2011, Gov. Brown forecast a $500 million budget reduction for both the UC and CSU systems. CalWORKs and Medi-Cal are also receiving heavy cuts.

“There were certain things that had to be met and Brown’s measure came closest,” said Frank Wells, CTA spokesman.

Wells said that one of the key things that the CTA was looking for was a plan that puts money into the Proposition 98 base, voted into the state constitution in 1988 to ensure that enough funding would be set aside for education. Its other interest was to pay down the state deficit.
“It would be ideal if all major players agree on one tax plan and get behind it,” Wells said.

Currently, there are two other major plans in the works that could dilute the one that Gov. Brown has proposed. The Munger initiative called their tax plan, Our Children, Our Future, and the California Federation of Teachers named theirs The Millionares Tax of 2012.

“It’s still early in the process, but if there are too many initiatives on the ballot, people tend to vote no to all of them,” Wells said.
Brown’s plan would draw funds from a temporary rise in sales tax of 1 – 2 percent and raising the income tax on single earners who make a minimum $250,000 a year and joint earners of $500,000.

“From a CTA position, we felt the governor’s plan is the strongest and hope more come on board so we can pass this and keep California’s schools from suffering more than they already are,” Wells said.

Advocates of the CFT said that if more than one, or all of the initiatives were to pass, then the matter would most likely end up being decided in court. The “millionaire tax plan” would raise the tax rate on those who make more than $1 million by 3 percent and those who make more than $5 million by 5 percent.

“Working class, middle class and poor people have suffered greatly during this economic crisis, and we don’t think that they can afford to pay more,” said Anthony Thigpenn, chairman of California Calls, a statewide alliance that works on tax, fiscal and budget reforms. “Those in the higher brackets have done very well, and we think that they can afford to pay more to absolve the state’s crisis.”

Our Children, Our Future highlights the fact that California statistically has one of the lowest ranks with regard to investment into the education of its citizens, and is dead last in class size. The plan will benefit K-12 and early childhood programs only, and doesn’t include higher education.


Disclaimer: The Daily Sundial is not responsible for comments posted on dailysundial.com. In accordance with the Communications Decency Act of 1996 the Sundial is not liable for the content of comments. By commenting, all persons posting on dailysundial.com have agreed to our comment policy. If a comment does not abide by the comment policy the Sundial reserves the right to delete comments without warning. The Daily Sundial advises persons commenting not to abuse their First Amendment rights, and to avoid comments of hate speech or encouraging violence.

  • sparkleplnty

    After learning of the two CSU’s presidents 10% raises, I will be voting NO on any new taxes.  Being a CSU employee who has received no pay increases over the years will not give up anymore of my money to pay the “Better and Smarter People”.  They are all out of touch with reality.

  • S. Crisp

    Government worker unions will ALWAYS support a tax increase. There are two classes of people in California: the state workers, and the rest of us who have to be taxed to pay for their unsustainable benefits and pensions.

  • Vlad

    Jerry Brown is a doofus.

    CALFAC are a group of morons, looking out for their own interests, and could give a rats @ss about students.
    @David_the_libertarian:disqus 
    As long as the State is pursuing high-speed rail and cuts to education, they should get what they deserve.

    Anyone who votes Democratic are “useful idiots”

    Vlad

  • David the small-L libertarian

    Cut education across the board; the state is being hijacked by it.  I will not be voting for another tax increase.

  • Georgia Bowts

    I approve the political decisions of Gov. Jerry Brown. He is a man of respect and high common sense.
    Clean Gone