The student media organization of California State University Northridge

Daily Sundial

The student media organization of California State University Northridge

Daily Sundial

The student media organization of California State University Northridge

Daily Sundial

Loading Recent Classifieds...
The Girls Who Code club met together in Sierra Hall, on Friday, Sept. 15, in Northridge, Calif. Club members played around with a program to create a virtual game.
The CSUN club that’s encouraging women in STEM
Miya Hantman, Reporter • September 18, 2023

CSUN’s Girls Who Code club is just one of many across many campuses and countries, including 110 in...

Students form a crowd for DJ Mal-Ski on Friday, Sept. 8, 2023 in Northridge, Calif.
Matador Nights carnival makes a splash at the USU
Ryan Romero, Sports Editor • September 21, 2023

The University Student Union hosted “Matador Nights” on Sept. 8 from 7 p.m. to midnight. The...

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock by FiledIMAGE.
Women’s Soccer has Closed the Competitive Gap
Luis Silva, Reporter • September 19, 2023

There is no longer a significant competitive gap in the sport of women’s soccer. There is a brighter...

The line for concert merchandise on the second night of The Eras Tour in Paradise, Nev., on Saturday, March 25, 2023.
My experience at The Eras Tour
Miley Alfaro, Sports Reporter • September 18, 2023

It’s been a long time coming. I began watching The Eras Tour, Taylor Swift’s ongoing concert trek,...

Within the Oaxacan town of Asuncion Nochixtlan, we find my mother’s birthplace, Buena Vista. Photo taken July 29, 2023.
I Love Being Mexican
September 12, 2023
A student holds up a sign during a rally outside of the CSU Board of Trustees meeting in Long Beach, Calif., on Sept. 12, 2023.
CSU board approves tuition increase amid protests
Trisha Anas, Editor in Chief • September 15, 2023

The California State Board of Trustees on Wednesday approved a 6% tuition increase for the next five...

group of mena and women touching hands
Miracles In Action Restores Patients’ Lives and Actualizes their Potential

Diversity of views is needed for next Constitution Day

Last Saturday, CSUN hosted a Constitution Day seminar to celebrate the signing of the United States Constitution. All schools that receive federal funding were required by law to hold events on Constitution Day. Thanks to the College of Extended Learning, which sponsored the event, CSUN prepared a professional seminar, complete with catered breakfast and a panel of professors from CSUN as speakers.

As good as the format was, however, the seminar was definitely lacking in content. The speakers themselves were excellent, providing polished presentations and delivering substantive speeches on important constitutional issues. What was missing was any diversity in views on the Constitution.

The panel of speakers was made up of two political science professors, Chris Shortell and Sylvia Snowiss, and one professor from the Journalism Department, Maureen Rubin.

Each chose an issue of contemporary importance to constitutional theory. Dr. Rubin spoke about the First Amendment, focusing on freedom of the press and religious freedom. Dr. Shortell talked about the war powers of the president and the responsibility of Congress and the people to protect civil liberties. Snowiss covered the current debate over abortion and gay rights.

All of these are important issues that effect our daily lives. They bear even greater weight with the nomination of judge John Roberts to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

A balanced debate about the powers of the Supreme Court and the differing philosophies of constitutional law that various judges bring to the bench would have been welcome. Even a straightforward presentation on the actual text of the Constitution would have been beneficial, given the lack of knowledge that many Americans, and students in particular, have of the Constitution.

However, participants of the seminar were subjected solely to liberal viewpoints. Rubin opened her presentation with a clip from the “Daily Show with John Stewart” and expressed her concern about the “religious right” and its assault on the First Amendment. Snowiss spoke about the “fundamental” rights of abortion and privacy, especially regarding gay marriage. Shortell, while refraining from many of the rhetorical flourishes enjoyed by his colleagues, was nevertheless hostile to many of the executive powers of the president in wartime.

This is not to say that the speakers were unreasonable or unprofessional. Yet their comments were made from a solely liberal viewpoint. The participants of the seminar would have been better served had there been at least one speaker who expressed an originalist view of the Constitution. The give and take that naturally accompanies such an exchange of diverse views is far more educational than a uniform recitation of commonly held beliefs.

It is not as if there are no professors who hold views contrary to the current liberal doctrine. The History Department alone contains some fine conservative professors who argue from an originalist viewpoint. There should have been no excuse for excluding dissenting voices from the seminar.

Since this is only the first Constitution Day to be held, there will be plenty of time to improve on the format. Hopefully, the organizers of next year’s event will include a more diverse set of viewpoints. After the question and answer session, where I had disagreed with some of the points made by the speakers, one of the staffers at the College of Extended Learning told me that it was “always nice to hear different points of view.”


Sean Paroski can be reached at

More to Discover