Colorblind ideology; a new form of racism

 By
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

Illustration by Gabriel Ivan Orendain-Necochea / Senior Illustrator

Imagine yourself walking in your own neighborhood , alone and lost in your own thoughts. It is dark and you are returning home from the convenience store. Suddenly, a man follows you, but you don’t know why. He is not someone you recognize and you haven’t done anything wrong. Fear envelops you. You can hear your own heartbeat. You start to walk faster, but he still follows you and you are hunted like an animal.

The candy and iced-tea was not enough to show Trayvon Martin’s attacker of the teen’s innocence and humanity. Perhaps, the only thing that may have saved 17-year-old Martin’s life would be if Martin could have magically transformed into a white male. Maybe then, Martin could have celebrated his 18th birthday with his family if only he was not “walking while black.”

Let us be clear about one thing. Martin’s death was not a tragedy or sad accident, as some may wish to describe the story-his murder was a product of legacy of racism in this country and his murderer acted upon his own racial prejudices. Yes, the death could have been a white young male, but it was not, as it is not in many instances of racial profiling cases. Martin’s death is only a needle in a haystack of young black lives lost in a society that continues to hide between two different racial narratives where white supremacy is the common thread.

We are not supposed to talk about race in today’s colorblind society. Critics will point out that racism is of the past- slavery was abolished in 1865, less than 150 years ago. Jim Crow law was put to an end more than 50 years ago; we elected and re-elected our first African-American president. Consequently, any attempts at talking about race end up with someone being accused of pulling out the race card.

However, most people fail to realize that the presence of racial prejudice does not necessarily mean one is racist. At the same time, we must recognize that institutional racism can exist without individual racists and in the quest to find culprits for racism, we  can fail to remember the legacy of oppression still echoing in our present.

A racist is defined as a person “who believes in racism, the doctrine that a certain human race is superior to any or all other races.” On the other hand, racial prejudice “accounts for differences in human character or ability,” which is heavily influenced by stereotypes of perceived racial order and typical characteristics of members of one group.

And while most people, if not all, have some degree of prejudices about other human beings in the world we live in, an attitude becomes discriminatory when resulting in an action, such as racial profiling.

Both prejudice and discrimination make up racism where power is undoubtedly a necessary precondition for racial discrimination. More importantly, the issue of racial prejudice becomes problematic when it goes beyond mere beliefs and effects peoples’ lives socially, economically, and political.

When the self-appointed neighborhood watch leader, George Zimmerman, 28, a white-Hispanic male, decided to follow Martin who was returning home from the store, something triggered his assessment of the situation. Martin was not carrying a gun, but rather holding candy and iced-tea in his hands, so Zimmerman could not have felt imminent danger. In fact, this is the main reason why Zimmerman’s attorney will no longer employ the ‘stand your ground’ law, to defend his client, which states that Florida citizens can use deadly force and without a duty to retreat if “he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or greatly bodily harm to himself or herself.”

Nor was Martin committing a crime that would somehow justify Zimmerman’s action. Perhaps more importantly, Zimmerman’s family has repeatedly pointed out that he has a black friend so he simply cannot be a racist. Yet, for Zimmerman, this young man looked suspicious and was convinced Martin was “up to no good or he is on drugs or something,” and thus, decided to take action even when the dispatcher from Sanford police department urged Zimmerman not to follow Martin.

Dr. Anthony Ratcliff, a Pan-African professor at CSUN, said that being young, black, and male meant something inherent to Zimmerman, which resulted in a racial profiling.

“He perceived (Martin) doing something wrong before he perceived him doing something right so he (was using) a white-supremacist lens,” said Ratcliff.

Ratcliff also added that Zimmerman’s gun gave him power and enough confidence to follow Martin and subsequently, approach him. Undoubtedly, it’s the combination of power, symbolically and literally, and prejudice that ultimately results in the examples of racism rarely discussed.

“People want to focus on race as an interpersonal belief and this is tangential to the real issue, which is structural and institutional racism,” said Ratcliff.

A 2011 Human Right Watch report established that the burden of incarceration falls disproportionately on minorities where black men are incarcerated at a rate more than six times that of white non-Hispanic males. In 2009, one in 10 black males, aged 25-29 were in prison or jail. For white males, this number was only one in 64.

Perhaps even more disturbing, author of the book ‘The New Jim Crow,’ Michelle Alexander writes “there are more African-Americans under correctional control today-in prison or jail, on probation or parole than were enslaved in 1850; a decade before the Civil War began. Furthermore as of 2004, “more African-American were disenfranchised due to felon disenfranchisement laws than in 1870, the year the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified,” according to Alexander.

It’s imperative to remember that once you are labeled a criminal, you can also face legal discrimination against employment, housing, access, education and public benefits, the same tools needed to reintegrate into society.

Some argue that racial profiling does not exist and police officers are simply taking criminals to jail as a part of their job responsibility. However, evidence shows the contrary, especially when it comes to the so called race-neutral “war on drugs.”

According to Drug Policy Alliance, African Americans comprise 14 percent of regular drug users. Yet, almost 40 percent of those arrested for drug offenses are African-American. Furthermore, African-Americans serve almost as much time in federal prison for a drug offense as whites do for a violent offense. The numbers are equally sobering for women of color.

A 2011 report by American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) show that since 1986, there have been an 800 percent increase of African-American women behind bars, in which a great proportion are for drug-related offenses. Additionally, the report states, “while nearly two-thirds of women under probation supervision are white, nearly two-thirds of those confined in jails and prisons are women of color.”

While the black population is overrepresented in prison, they are undoubtedly underrepresented in numerous positions outside prison walls.

There have only been eight black senators in the country’s history, only three were elected by popular vote. But if the Senate were supposed to be colorblind and representative of the U.S. population,  almost 13 of its current 100 members would be African-Americans, instead of two.

Perhaps even more significantly, of the 112 judges who have served as Supreme Court Justices, 96 percent have been white males. Two were African-American men and one was a Hispanic woman.

“If you think about the institutions of our society (like the Senate), there are very few people of color in these spaces and these are the places that are defining a lot of what’s going on in our society,” said Ratcliff.

In the corporate world, the numbers are equally disparaging.

A 2010 report by the Alliance for diversity census illustrate that white men not only dominate corporate boards, but increased their presence since 2004 where 72 percent are now white men.

At the same time, the latest U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics report shows that unemployment is highest among black and Latinos where the black unemployment rate is almost double that of whites; 14 percent compared to 7 percent.

“If white folks began to see whiteness as a race ordering this whole racial hierarchy, then they might see it as a problem and maybe then, we can start to de-construct it (racism),” said Ratcliff.

“Whites have to be cognitive of white privilege in order for white privilege to be challenged.”

We don’t need a false and dishonest color-blind ideology that only eliminates other people’s experiences and everyday reality. Nor can we ignore the fact that this country is still a society run and organized around a white, patriarchal ideology and until we change that system, this nation will not move beyond race. A greater communication cross culturally can allow us to address our stereotypical and racist views with reality rather than how we have been socialized or grown to perceive people and other cultures.


Disclaimer: The Daily Sundial is not responsible for comments posted on dailysundial.com. In accordance with the Communications Decency Act of 1996 the Sundial is not liable for the content of comments. By commenting, all persons posting on dailysundial.com have agreed to our comment policy. If a comment does not abide by the comment policy the Sundial reserves the right to delete comments without warning. The Daily Sundial advises persons commenting not to abuse their First Amendment rights, and to avoid comments of hate speech or encouraging violence.

  • Jon Soto

    I entreat my minority bretheren and sisteren to see past the race baiting mind tricks of liberals who are more racist than any conservative. We non-liberals are the ones who want to see MLK’s dream into fruition. Skin color is meaningless, it is the intent of the person and the content of their character that is significant. Those who seek to cause racial tensions are among those we should be weary of. We must dethrone those who thrive on racial strife and invoke racial dis-harmony to put in their place those who believe that all Americans have a shot at greatness and seek to make peace with our neighbors. A source of ageless wisdom said, “Love thy neighbor as thy self.” I’m tired of the blame the white man sob stories that liberals keep peddling. No one is to blame but yourself for your misfortune. It is irresponsible to incite anti-anything race politics on a whole people. Minorities should embrace academic success, entrepeneurship, and liberty. Those are I hate to burst a liberal’s bubble: conservative values.  

  • Arman Gosparini

    Martin Luther King Jr. hoped for a country in which people were judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin. Following this tradition, I will reply:

    After the Trayvon Martin shooting, George Zimmerman was taken into custody for the shooting. His innocence was so compelling, the police chose to let the hispanic (I.E, not white, as this article tries to stress) man go. After the shooting, Zimmerman had suffered a broken nose, black eyes and a gash to the back of his head. The only injury on Martin apart from the single gunshot wound was on his knuckles. Zimmerman suffered defensive wounds. Martin suffered offensive wounds. There are only two explanations for this.

    Either your a paranoid conspiracy theorist and Zimmerman inflicted those injuries on himself in order to cover up his crime, or, the more likely event, is that Martin was a hot head who brought fists to a gun fight.

  • VladLenin

     I’ve interchanged Blacks and African-Americans.

    What today, is considered politically correct? In the 1990′s, African Americans wished to be called Blacks.

    Respect.

    Valad

  • BurgerLess

    This article is racist. Did you ever hear the term White-Hispanic before this case? Read more about Zimmerman. He is no white supremacist. Read all that is known about Martin, not just the rosy picture his parents paint.

  • Jon Soto

    Cultural victimhood academics is the real face of racism in America. True racism is the belief that we minorities can’t succeed without government hand outs. That we can’t make it in academia without lowering the academic bar or without laws that give us preference in university enrollment or jobs: that is racist. The idea that minorities can’t succeed on their own and achieve greatness when evidence has proven otherwise. The real racists are the Democrats. They are the ones who espouse these ideas, not the Republicans.

    • VladLenin

      Jon,

      Well said!

      Prior to LBJ’s Great Society, Blacks(African Americans) were making significant strides, relative to “white society.”
      Labor Participation was almost at par. Income disparities were narrowing. The “Black Family”, and Faith, were the cornerstone of the Black Community. The Civil Rights movement, as Emancipation was spearheaded by Republicans. Most Blacks voted Republican.

      Recognizing that opposing Civil Rights was futile, LBJ pivoted to “helping the black community.”

      To cap his pivot, LBJ stated: “I’ll have them N*gg**s voting Democrat for the next 200 years”

      Since The Great Society;
      Out-of-wedlock births in the black community is 72%. (lack of father’s in the home is the #1 factor for determining future poverty).
      Black Unemployment is twice the National Average (as the article indicates).
      Black Youth Unemployment is nearly 50%
      While Blacks represent 14% of the population, they account for 50% of all abortions.
      95% of killings of young black men, are perpetrated by other young black men
      80% of Detroit, Chicago, Washington DC, Oakland, LAUSD inner city minorities are functionally illiterate.

      Ergo, as the Black community has embraced Liberalism, their circumstances have deteriorated. Interestingly enough, circumstances for the white liberal political/intellectual class, as skyrocketed.

      Liberalism is the new PLANTATION.