California Faculty Association votes in favor of strike in fall

On+November+8%2C+faculty+and+students+gathered+on+campus+to+participate+in+the+CFA+informational+pickett+event.+Sundial+File+Photo
Back to Article
Back to Article

California Faculty Association votes in favor of strike in fall

On November 8, faculty and students gathered on campus to participate in the CFA informational pickett event. Sundial File Photo

On November 8, faculty and students gathered on campus to participate in the CFA informational pickett event. Sundial File Photo

On November 8, faculty and students gathered on campus to participate in the CFA informational pickett event. Sundial File Photo

On November 8, faculty and students gathered on campus to participate in the CFA informational pickett event. Sundial File Photo

Ron Rokhy

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Faculty and students participated in the California Faculty Association informational picket on campus on Nov. 8, 2011. Sundial File Photo

Faculty across all 23 CSU campuses have approved a statewide strike if their demands for a new collective bargaining agreement after 22 months of not having one aren’t met.

The results of the voting period, which lasted from April 16-27, came in yesterday at noon when Lillian Taiz, president of the California Faculty Association (CFA), announced in a teleconference that 95 percent of the 8,750 faculty members who voted affirmed the motion to strike.

To be passed, more than 50 percent of the 12,501 CFA had to vote yes, Taiz said.

“Now is the time for the voice of the faculty to be heard,” Taiz said. “The faculty of the CSU have had enough of executives putting themselves above, and they’ve had enough of managers cutting the budget.”

The work stoppages will come into effect next fall in the form of two-day “rolling strikes” if a final meeting with the CSU fails, said Andy Merrifield, associate vice president and bargaining team member of the CFA.

“We don’t have a clear timetable, but we’re going to have a sit down with management, and if it’s necessary, we’ll be going through a fact-finding process,” Merrifield said.

The main demands of the CFA, according to Merrifield, are issues regarding workload, compensation and academic freedom, among many others.

On November 8, faculty and students gathered on campus to participate in the CFA informational picket event. Sundial File Photo

“Academic freedom is fundamental,” Merrifield said. “We want this to be contractually recognized. The current contract is silent on academic freedom, and even though the CSU has said it is fundamental, it’s apparently not fundamental enough to put in contract.”

The CFA still maintains the position that they’re offering fair proposals to the CSU, according to Merrifield.

“We’re still demanding a 1 percent general service increase over three years, which we find reasonable,” Merrifield said. “It’s been a difficult and disappointing process. We didn’t want this fight, we offered modest proposals.”

However, a recent fact sheet released by the CSU claims the CFA’s proposals would cost the CSU $504.1 million more over the life of the agreement in salaries and tenure track hiring.

Taiz stressed the importance of solidarity between faculty members and students throughout this situation.

“We believe in our students, and the students and faculty are in this together,” Taiz said. “Both have been slammed by the CSU – students by rising tuition and faculty by furloughs and lay-offs. Students get ignored by the CSU and are being used as ATM machines.”

Merrifield insists a new contract will allow teachers to better accommodate the needs of students.

“We’re the people who teach, we’re the librarians and we’re the people who train and coach the athletes,” Merrifield said. “A fair contract will allow us to be better.”

Taiz once again reiterated the CFA’s stance that the CSU has been slowly transforming into a for-profit organization.

“We’re seeing a very disturbing trend accross campuses,” Taiz said. “As students pay more, they can’t get into classes, so they’re forced to pay extra for extended education for a course they need to graduate.”
“Our message to Reed is clear,” she added. “We just want to provide quality higher education to the students.”