CSU budget cuts protests need real political action, not just talk

By Ankur Patel
Contributor

Protesting in a way that is acceptable to the powers you are protesting against is, in effect, ineffective. When budget cuts come down, the people making those cuts know that there will be protests. It is a calculated decision, the ramifications of which they have already accounted for. They even recognize the possibility of being vilified.

The “Teach Out” on March 2 was a visible demonstration that received media attention and had a decent turnout but was ineffective because it lacked specific points of follow-up action.

We don’t like budget cuts and fee hikes! Yah, neither do I, but what can I do? As it was the Activist Student Coalition’s first major event, we can consider it a success in the fact that at least there was action.

“Class Action” on April 13 had a smaller turnout on this campus but was well coordinated throughout the California State University system thanks to Students for Quality Education and the California Faculty Association. This last demonstration was a success because people on this campus are now more familiar with Chancellor Reed and his salary than they were before.

Reed, the head of the 23 campuses that of the CSU system, Chancellor Mark G. Yudof who heads the 10 campuses of the University of California system, and Chancellor Jack Scott who heads the California Community College system represent public higher education in the state of California. Even so, they are just middle management. They don’t decide how much money comes into the education system. They just decide where that money should go (e.g. their salaries).

It is the California state legislature and the governor together that decide what to do with state tax dollars.

The legislature is made up of 40 state senators and 80 state assemblymen. How many do you know?

That is the problem. These are the people directly responsible for funding the education system in California and we are protesting, yelling, screaming, chanting, holding signs, and we don’t even know who these people are. 

Not only should we know them, we should be holding them to their job or voting them out.

In the November 2010 election, 100 state legislatures were up for election, 62 incumbents ran and 62 incumbents won. This after what were arguably the worst two years in the history of California in terms of the concentration of wealth into the hands of a few, the destruction of the environment, and of course, the desecration of public education from kindergarten through college. How did every single incumbent win?

Those in power know freshman come in not knowing what happened before and graduating activists leave without effectively educating the underclassmen. We are taught only about two political parties, we are taught only about capitalism, we are taught to keep our head down to get a job and pay our taxes.

An educated and informed citizenry is dangerous. Between the 23 CSUs, 10 UCs, and the 112 Community Colleges, we alone can elect 27 State Assemblymen. It’s time we made better use of our voice.

top

Disclaimer: The Daily Sundial is not responsible for comments posted on dailysundial.com. In accordance with the Communications Decency Act of 1996 the Sundial is not liable for the content of comments. By commenting, all persons posting on dailysundial.com have agreed to our comment policy. If a comment does not abide by the comment policy the Sundial reserves the right to delete comments without warning. The Daily Sundial advises persons commenting not to abuse their First Amendment rights, and to avoid comments of hate speech or encouraging violence.

  • Lupe G.

    i agree, we must hold these elected officials accountable !

  • Lupe G.

    i agree, we must hold these elected officials accountable !

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

      That is the point the article tries to make, but first we need to become familiar with our elected representatives without getting bogged down in these ideological battles that I find difficult to avoid.

  • http://profiles.google.com/onotse Onotse Ikharo

    Great read Ankur. I completely agree with you. You cant effect change until you know who is responsible for making change. This issue of not knowing whom to address our frustration toward in regard to legislation is not just a CSUN thing but a nationwide thing. The only way to cure it is to educate ourselves. Once we do this, we know who we want representing our voice and can make better decisions in regard to voting.

    Its baby steps. And I think an article like this is definitely a step in the right direction.

    • Vlad

      Onotse,

      While I concur with Ankur regarding the need for an educated electorate (which was paramount in the minds of the founders), he, and presumably you, want the VERY SAME THINGS that those who are currently in power want. More.

      There is no more. If you want less, and your willing to vote in politicians who will promise you less, let me know. I will be happy to help you sort it out.

      As for baby steps, there are states, like Wisconsin, and Ohio, and New Jersey that are taking those steps. The Statists are going apesh*t!

      Peace, out!

      Vlad

    • Vlad

      Onotse,

      While I concur with Ankur regarding the need for an educated electorate (which was paramount in the minds of the founders), he, and presumably you, want the VERY SAME THINGS that those who are currently in power want. More.

      There is no more. If you want less, and your willing to vote in politicians who will promise you less, let me know. I will be happy to help you sort it out.

      As for baby steps, there are states, like Wisconsin, and Ohio, and New Jersey that are taking those steps. The Statists are going apesh*t!

      Peace, out!

      Vlad

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

        I do want more, more say in how this government is run.

        I would take less material goods. And I would vote for a person promising less, if it was fair — which is arbitrary.

        • Vlad

          Fair? Fair, is a system established that provided “equal opportunities” to succeed.

          There are countless individuals (of all stripes) that break out of their “ovarian circumstance” as you assert above. There are an equal number who piss away whatever privilege they were born into.

          You claim to want less material goods, but continue to vote in politicians who keep promising “more goodies.” Now, you wonder why you’re being stuck with the bill.

          Vlad

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

            These are pointless dialogues. Your neo-conservative ideology is not appealing to me. Actionable solutions involve educating people on specific policies that are actually being debated and voted upon.

            The fact that we haven’t even talked about a single state assembly or state senate bill is indicative of where you want this conversation to go… nowhere.

            The fact of the matter is it is difficult to find intelligible information on what the laws that our legislatures are making (partly because the laws are being written by lobbyists). CalWatchDog is ok, but we need something better. Instead of wasting time here, can we go through bills and create a place for real analysis of legislation and legislatures?

            By occupying myself and other capable people in these sorts of unnecessary exercises in semantic futility, you continue to propagate the status-quo, which is an ovarian lottery.

          • Vlad

            BRING IT!

            YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT A SPECIFIC ASSEMBLYPERSON, OR BILL, LAY IT OUT.

            I’ve asserted countless times that the control of the State Assembly, and now the Governorship by Democrats, and the INCESTUOUS RELATIONSHIP to the lobbyists and Public Employee Unions who are “gorging themselves at the trough” has created the problems that our state finds itself in.

            Republicans in California have no authority to dictate the direction of the State. You want to change things in the State, STOP VOTING IN THE SAME PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL POLITICIANS INTO OFFICE, AND THEN COMPLAINING ABOUT HOW THEY GOVERN!

            Other States with Republican Leadership aren’t raising tuition.

            Continue to do what you do, and you’ll continue to get what you get. STOP COMPLAINING!

            PEACE, OUT!

            VLAD

          • Vlad

            Let’s talk about the Prison Guard Contract. How much did that impact your Tuition Increases?

            That’s just the beginning. Watch the Teachers Union(CALFAC that you supported), the Police & Fire Deparments, the California Nurses Association, etc. etc, etc. As they get serviced in the front, you’re getting serviced in the rear.

            Peace, out!

            Vlad

          • Vlad

            Let’s talk about the Prison Guard Contract. How much did that impact your Tuition Increases?

            That’s just the beginning. Watch the Teachers Union(CALFAC that you supported), the Police & Fire Deparments, the California Nurses Association, etc. etc, etc. As they get serviced in the front, you’re getting serviced in the rear.

            Peace, out!

            Vlad

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

            How many time do I have to make this point?! The democratic party is STATUS-QUO. The republican party is STATUS-QUO. When these two entities have 99% of the decision making power they work out deals to keep themselves in collective power. The soundbites they release to the public is not the same conversation they have behind closed doors.

            Are you attacking the concept of unions or specific instances of gross misconduct?

          • Vlad

            Nonsense. You think that was what was happening this Spring in Wisconsin – behind door conversations.

            Republicans came in to break-up the Status quo of Profligate spending, and Incestuous relationship to Public Employee Union’s.

            The concept of Unions is fine, contained within the dynamics of the marketplace. Management on one side of the table, Labor on the other side. When Labor takes more than is sustainable within the marketplace (i.e. GM, Chrysler) they should be accountable to bankruptcy proceedings. When Labor demands more than an industry can support (i.e. 1960′s Steel) they can’t then complain that “jobs were outsourced overseas”

            Public Employee Unions are Incestuous. Unions and Liberal Politicians (95% PEU’s donate to Democrats) work out a deal, where the Unions get more, which gets returned to the Politician in the form or Political donations, which then get’s returned to the PEU’s. (I.e. Prison Guards, Teachers, Professors, Nurses, etc, etc, etc.)

            A commie party doesn’t have enough juice to overthrow the entrenched party system. You need to keep your support behing the Progressive Liberals in power. Of course, then you can’t complain that “they overspent” their budget, and now they have to raise tuition even higher.

            You complain, and then empower the very people who are enslaving you to indebtedness.

            Peace, out!

            Vlad

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

            Labor is the most valuable thing on this planet. Gold does not dig itself out of the ground, water does not damn itself up, and food does not grow on trees [in the quantity that our population requires].

            Through human labor.

            When you put a value on human labor, and then a minimum value, and then force labor from one part of the world to compete against labor in another part, it is the ideology of the free market that is enslaving us — because it isn’t a free market, it can never be a free market. A free market allows those that can, to manipulate market regulations. That is what we have, a not so free market manipulated to devalue labor, so to create a concentration of wealth. [read that again]

          • Vlad

            Nonsense!

            Who is John Galt?

  • David the small-L libertarian

    A thoughtful piece–much better than the Sundial’s standard fare.

    “We are taught only about two political parties, we are taught only about capitalism, we are taught to keep our head down to get a job and pay our taxes.”

    You are wrong: Students seem to be learning all about how evil Republicans are and about the virtues of Marxism, Communism and Socialism. They’re also taught to have everyone else pay for everything for them… or so it seems.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

      Clean economic ideology is inapplicable.

      Cutting taxes on the wealthiest is not defensible anymore.

      • Vlad

        Progressive Statism is unsustainable.

        The “Bush Tax” cuts were implemented across the board. Find below the resulting percentage of taxes paid by quintile, as a result. The class and race narrative that you’re pushing isn’t support by the facts.

        The Top 20% of Income Earners went from paying 81.2 to 86.3% of all collected taxes.
        The Second 20% of Income Earners went from paying 13.5 to 12.9% of all collected taxes.
        The Middle 20% of Income Earners went from paying 5.7 to 4.4% of all collected taxes.
        The Fourth 20% of Income Earners went from paying paying 1.1 to receving .8% in Earned Income Tax Credits
        The Lowest 20% of Income Earners went from getting 1.6 to 2.6% in Earned Income Tax Credits.

        As Kennedy, and Reagan, and Bush understood, you need to lower taxes to spur enonomic activity. What is the GDP for the most recent quarter.

        Here’s a great article that came out yesterday in the Investors Business Daily.

        http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal…-Recovery-.htm

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

          I am not pushing a race narrative, your responses are generic.

          The same play on numbers can be made with charitable donations. Larger donations are made by the wealthiest, but the less wealthy donate more as a percentage of their total income.

          • Vlad

            Data and facts aren’t generic. You either have the facts, or you don’t.

            You denounced the tax cuts, I proved that those cuts A) increased revenue, through increases in gdp, and B) Most impacted the highest earners.

            As for charitable donations, you know that Conservatives donate SIGNIFICANTLY more to charity than do Progressives. Did you see Joe Biden’s charitable donations?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

            Statistics are as unbiased as the people presenting them. In an argument, you are not going to present evidence that doesn’t support your point.

      • David the small-L libertarian

        Since the “wealthiest” pay the overwhelming majority of income taxes and nearly half don’t pay any income taxes at all, why is it “not defensible” to cut any? Wouldn’t that be “fair”? That’s what I hear Obama say all the time–”pay their fair share,” is his mantra. Seems like “the rich” are paying their fair share and then some.

        In California, with a population of some 37-million, just 144,000 households pay half of all state income tax. Just how much would you like them to pay?

        I have a better idea: cutting spending.

        “Clean economic ideology is inapplicable.” Huh?

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

          Pragmatically speaking, pure capitalism is inapplicable, as is pure communism.

          It isn’t about those 144,000 households, its about the fact that the richest 400 people in America have more wealth than the 155,000,000 at the bottom. It isn’t about paying their fair share, its about not taking advantage of bail outs and political connections. It isn’t about mansions and diamond rings, its about building infrastructure in the form of sewers and electric grids. It isn’t about California or the United States in isolation, its about humanity as a whole.

          Your narrow focus on American suburbia is the only way your ideology makes sense.

          I don’t know why I feel obligated to respond to either of you, but you should think about the ovarian-lottery.

  • Vlad

    Incumbents get reelected, because the same people are in charge of drawing the districts (gerrymandering).

    California has had a Liberal Democratic majority for decades.

    Sadly, CALFAC, and the Teachers Unions that you rallied with a couple of weeks ago are the one’s responsible for maintaining the power structure in the state. They (Public Employee Unions) feed the politicans. The politicians feed the PEU’s.

    They claim support for your cause, as they get theirs. You get hosed.

    Your parents may have voted Democrat. Democrats are enslaving you!

    End slavery, vote Republican.

    WAKE UP!

    Vlad

    • Brian

      No

      • Vlad

        Then as the saying goes – continue to do what you do, and you’ll continue to get what you get.

        Vlad

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

      Citizens Redistricting Commission.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

    It is not that I think the solution lies entirely in the legislature, but there is a lot of power concentrated in those 120 seats.

    27 out of 80 State Assembly seats would be slightly more than 1/3, which is a magic number in many types of legislation, including approval of the California State University Board of Trustees.

    If “we” took 27 seats we would have leverage.

  • CSUNStudent

    You do realize that most of the incumbents who won reelection are Democrats? LOL

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

      You are still stuck in a democrat and republican binary?

      You don’t understand that democrats don’t protect the environment? You don’t recognize the fact that democrats have gone along with cuts to education?

      Democrats and Republicans are both for war in Libya (and a perpetual war machine), they are both for a massive prison industrial complex, they are both for wall street bail outs!

      Not to say that there aren’t good democrats, or even good republicans, but as political structures they are both status-quo.

      The status-quo profits from war, the status-quo profits from a dumb and domesticated citizenry that can name more athletes than elected representatives, the status-quo destroys the environment for a few bucks, the status-quo destroys food to keep the price of wheat, grain and rice high.

      The status-quo is a citizenry so ignorant that it thinks existing power structures will change themselves.

      • Vlad

        You oppose Democrats. You despise Republicans.

        What do you suggest? Revolution! Then what?

        Peace, out!

        Vlad

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

          Independent.

          I am not saying that I oppose all of the individuals that are democrat or republican, but the fact that you have people who take pride in voting down party lines regardless of the candidate is a stain on democracy.

          • Vlad

            I take PRIDE in voting down ideological grounds.

            Smaller government (as enumerated in the Constitution)
            Less spending on entitlements
            Protection of Liberty for the citizen
            Lower taxes
            Empowering of the individual
            Free Market Capitalism (not Corporatism, or Crony Capitalism)

            Peace, out!

            Vlad

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ankur-Patel/2505963 Ankur Patel

            “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”
            - Mohandas Gandhi