Gender inequality still an issue for business women

Women in the business world may still be facing gender inequality thought to be long since eradicated, a 2010 study found.

The survey found that women received an average of $4,600 less initially than their male colleagues. Women were also given fewer opportunities for promotion, and their salaries increased an average of 2 percent compared with men’s 21 percent in 2008.

Catalyst, a nonprofit aimed at increasing opportunities for women in business, conducted a survey of 4,000 MBAs who graduated between 1996 and 2007 from business schools in the U.S., Asia, Canada and Europe.

“From the first job on, men received higher compensation, were more highly placed in the organization and received more promotions of greater monetary value over time,” the study  revealed.

CSUN alumna Rosa Davies, who earned her degree in management in Spring 2011, said she was not surprised by the salary gap.

“People pay on experience and create salaries based on potential,” said Davies, who now works as a medical insurance agent. “There is a perception that men can handle stress better. When a woman tries to be seen on the same level, (management) tend to notice her and not what she is doing.”

Others suggest that perhaps the gender divide in business salaries can be looked at differently.

“Economists have found that if you compare people with the same educational background, there isn’t much gender-based discrimination,” said Dr. Shirley Svorny, economics professor. “When you see differences in wages, it’s because (researchers) have not compared apples to apples. If you compare women and men who have the same education and who have been working for the same amount of time, it is hard to find differences in salaries.”

The Catalyst study results also showed that the presence of a mentor in a recent graduate’s career helped significantly, finding that, “men who had a mentor received $9,260 more in their first post-MBA job than women with a mentor.”

Mentors, as defined by the study, were individuals whom students relied on for career advice and networking prior to their first post-graduate jobs. The study showed that, while men and women were equally likely to have a mentor, men with those relationships were more likely to earn a higher entry level position.

Though the study found that men and women were equally likely to have active mentoring relationships, men’s mentors tended to be more highly placed in the corporations.

“Research shows that when left to their own devices, individuals choose to associate with others like themselves,” the study noted. “Thus, men are more likely to affiliate with other men and women with other women. … Because in most organizations there are more men than women in senior executive positions, the pool of male mentors at the top is correspondingly larger.”

Davies, who did not have a mentor until she began her first job, said she could have benefited from a mentor.

“I considered my fellow classmates my mentors,” Davies said. “But they could not give me job references after graduation. Now my hiring manager is a mentor to me, but he and I are essentially on the same level in the company.”

Davies did not think that she could have benefited more from a female mentor, and the Catalyst study showed the same results.
While mentoring, and especially sponsorship, is helpful and even necessary, it isn’t enough, the study noted.

“It’s not a silver bullet that will close the gender gap—even women with highly placed mentors continued to fall further and further behind men over time,” the study noted.

top

Disclaimer: The Daily Sundial is not responsible for comments posted on dailysundial.com. In accordance with the Communications Decency Act of 1996 the Sundial is not liable for the content of comments. By commenting, all persons posting on dailysundial.com have agreed to our comment policy. If a comment does not abide by the comment policy the Sundial reserves the right to delete comments without warning. The Daily Sundial advises persons commenting not to abuse their First Amendment rights, and to avoid comments of hate speech or encouraging violence.

  • guest

    Quote: “The survey found that women received an average of $4,600 less initially than their male colleagues… From the first job on, men received higher compensation, were more highly placed in the organization and received more promotions of greater monetary value over time, the study revealed.”

    Do women really earn less money than men? Yes. Too bad, however, that those who jump on the sex discrimination bandwagon refuse to examine the facts. Girls get better grades in high school than boys. Women earn more college degrees than men, and females outnumber men in graduate school. But here’s where the differences begin. Women tend to major in lower-paying “humanities” fields rather than in higher-paying disciplines such as engineering, science and technology.

    Furthermore, the highly touted 75-cents-on-the-dollar figure is only accurate when you compare all women to all men. Kinda like comparing apples to trucks. If women really did earn only 75 cents to every dollar a man earns, for the same job, a smart, dastardly, money-grubbing bottom-line oriented boss would only hire women at three-quarters on the dollar!

    Economist June O’Neil, former head of the respected Congressional Budget Office, specializes in labor matters. O’Neil, in analyzing the alleged “gender pay-gap,” compared apples to apples. She studied the salaries of women in the same industries as men, with the same academic background, who have been on the job for the same length of time, and discovered virtually no difference in pay.

    Source: “Ten Things You Can’t Say in America” by Larry Elder          

  • Sanysoe

    If anyone actually worked for female bosses they would know what kind of painful ordeal it is. Not only are women more irrational they always have an attitude of something to prove.

    Men also don’t get to take weeks off for maternity leave

    • David the small-L libertarian

      To quote Dennis Miller:  I don’t want to go off on a rant, but…

      Many (male) government employees, including CSUN employees, get to take six weeks off at taxpayers’ expense for paternity leave, leaving the employer shorthanded and forcing others to take up the slack.  This is ostensibly to “bond” with this babbling bundle of joy who isn’t even self-aware until about age one.  It’s an outrage and is discriminatory against those who don’t have children.  If Daddy thinks this is so important he should plan ahead and bank some vacation time before knocking up the Mrs.

      How much of that “free” 240 hours do you think men spend making goo-goo eyes at their precious little urinating, deficating, screaming vegetable?  And how much of that time do you think they spend doing something else, like painting the house, playing golf or going out the the ball game?

      I don’t have and don’t want children, but I have a great new big-screen 3D high-definition TV that I’d like to “bond” with for six weeks—and I’d like the taxpayers to pay for it.  Not surprisingly, my employer said this didn’t qualify.

      Oh, and one more thing:  Employers would be wise to hire only women so they can pay them less.

    • Old Glory

      Sorry to inform you state employees, men or women, can take 6 weeks off paid for maternity leave.